On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:33:21AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > Why would changing from %config to non-%config require > > > changes in the scriplets at all? > > > > The above referred to the following part of the draft: > > > > "A valid exception to this rule would be existing packages where > > configuration is still done via the init file. In this case, the init > > file could be marked as %config to preserve a users configuration upon > > upgrade, hopefully so that the user can migrate said configuration to > > a new /etc/sysconfig/<service> config file." > > > > Does it make more sense now? > > No. If it changes from %config (modified) to non-%config, it would > still get moved on upgrade, unless I'm forgetting the state machine. That's why I suggested %prein -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpAclbR7CSkl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
