Re: Re: Firmware packaging, v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "MD" == Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx> writes:

MD> One can argue Fedora shouldn't be in the business of distributing
MD> these, and I'd agree.  (related to another thread on FAB, there
MD> shouldn't be a problem with a hardware distributor adding a
MD> package to their installs that provides a yum repo file pointing
MD> at their tree of firmware though.)

Well, I've made that argument before and lost.  Others couldn't see
any reason to have a package that sets up a repository, although it
seems pretty obvious to me.

 - J<

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux