Jesse Keating wrote : > I'd still prefer that these files aren't marked as %config. Perhaps a new > init system will allow for us to place these files somewhere other than /etc > and really drive the point home that these files are not for configuration. Same here. Those are scripts, not config files... and marking them as such encourages people to edit them, which is not a good idea, since those files mostly contain code and not configuration, thus a later version is much more likely to break. Not only because of changed configuration options, but because of changed interaction between the init script and what it runs (like renamed command line options for a daemon it starts, running a daemon as root which drop privileges alone or directly launching it as a user etc.). At worst, I'd force new packages to _never_ mark them as %config and leave existing packages with bits of config in their init script as they are, clearly identifying them somewhere in the wiki if necessary, until we switch to a new init system. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6 Load : 0.44 0.25 0.19 -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging