Re: Firmware packaging, v3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mercredi 28 février 2007 à 07:31 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis a écrit :
> On 27.02.2007 21:00, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>  >
> > - use <blah>-firmware naming
> > [...]
> > 2) Firmware packages should be named <foo>-firmware, where <foo> is the
> >    driver or other hardware component that the firmware is for.
> 
> I think it's totally confusing to have prefixes ( say 
> {gnome,python,perl,kde,xfce,kmod,whatever}-foo) everywhere else, but use 
> a postfix in this case. Sticking to one scheme would be nice.

We're not having prefixes everywhere else, we have a huge postfix use.
So far prefixes are mostly used to group different bits of the same
thing while postfixes are more a categorisation, so firmware fits there
nicely

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux