On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 14:58 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 15:55 -0500, Matt Wringe wrote: > > > I would have to disagree, these are not Fedora packages in a Fedora > > repository, but rather jpp packages in a Fedora repository. This is > > exactly the distinction we want to make by including the 'jpp'. > > I think this is a point on which I would firmly disagree. If it is part > of Fedora, then it is a Fedora package. > +1 I want to address the issues you guys have trying to make it easy to sync packages between jpackage and Fedora but the idea that a package in our repository is actually a jpackage package is just plain wrong. jpackage is a cross-distro repository, Fedora is a distro. The goals are different. The requirements of each are different. The packages can largely be the same, but once in a while there will be things that require local customization. We don't just ship upstream jpackage. We value add and integrate them with Fedora specifics where appropriate. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
