On Tuesday, 13 February 2007 at 18:01, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Matthias Saou (thias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > For the ipw2100 and ipw2200 firmwares, do updated written > > permissions still need to be obtained from Intel, or do the current > > ones match these new guidelines? (I'm asking because I always thought > > they both were fine, but they weren't) > > The ipw2100/2200 licenses, as written, were deemed OK. (Yes, this > is a change.) If that is correct, why are #217350 and #217351 still blocking FE-Legal? Regards, R. -- Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
