On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 09:53 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 17:03 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > On Tuesday 16 January 2007 21:45, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Conflicts > > > > I still don't think that the suggested way of handling library name conflicts > > (or more specifically, the ld.so.conf part of it) makes sense. > > > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-December/msg00060.html > > > OK. Do you have any ideas on how we should handle this? This was the > only idea I could come up with, but I can see the flaw in it. That's exactly the situation rpath is being designed for. /me ducks and hides. Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
