On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 16:05 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 16 January 2007 16:00, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > No, actually, RHEL doesn't support v3 -> v5 upgrades afaik. At least, > > RHEL has never previously supported upgrades across more than one major > > release. > > Hrm, I'm getting conflicting information from those over the wall. > > However even still, RHEL4 -> RHEL5 is a pretty big jump, that's FC3~ -> FC6 to > think about. I just think we could widen our horizon a bit on how long to > keep a (valid) conflict in the spec file. I don't think it would be a problem if the packager rationalized it with: # Needed for RHEL 4 -> RHEL 5 upgrade ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
