On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 19:12 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Repotag seems to encourage such
> repo mixing somewhat, which is why I'm slightly leaning against it.
OTOH, we'll never completely prevent people shooting themselves in the
foot; all we can do make that less painful.
> But if there is a "repotag", it needs to be placed in the release tag in a way
> that it doesn't affect version comparisons between package releases (within a
> repo). Just defining %{dist} eg. as .elX.epel wouldn't work as %{dist} is
> optional,
Could EPEL make it mandoatory for its packages ? It seems that expanding
%{dist} for this would be very low overhead and unintrusive for
packagers.
David
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
