Re: Source Url Guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 12:48 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Tom 'spot' Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > > As for the whole thing, I'd argue that they should be suggests-guidelines,
> > > not required-guidelines.
> > 
> > Why? Is there any reason why we don't want this information in the
> > package?
> 
> I dunno - it just feels like something that should be 'please do this',
> not 'package rejected because you didn't do this.'

Sorry. If you don't eat your meat, you cannot have any pudding.

HOW CAN YOU HAVE ANY PUDDING IF YOU DON'T EAT YOUR MEAT?!?

~spot

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux