On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 22:57 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:45:25PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Here's my first draft of a SourceURL guideline. This tries to
> > encapsulate current practices but a few new things had to be added
> > related to SRPMs where no upstream source exists. This draft will
> > probably need some touching up as I whipped it up pretty quickly but
> > hopefully it captures the spirit of what we're trying to achieve.
>
> Looks OK. But since we're commenting on source origin could somewhere
> a kind request ("SHOULD") to (srpm-)package upstream sources/patches
> with original timestamps where possible be embedded?
That sounds like a good best practice. It sounds like a separate item
the way things are currently phrased. Do you have some wording to fit
it in, or do you just want to throw it in a separate recommendation.
-Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
