Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"TC" == Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
TC> I vote for this. I think it is rather unlikely that we'd have a
TC> GPL vs ASL or GPL vs BSD licensed software component.
Such beasts do exist (Apache forced some folks to dual-license with the
ASL their GPL'ed code in order to do collaborative development).
But I agree it is unlikely (BTW, that story did not have a very happy
ending).
And even if we did, the license tag would indicate the license of the
package well enough.
Right.
Ad if we ever have to release more than one, we will need different
package names anyway, like apache-joram and objectweb-joran, each with
its proper License:.
So I vote for (1) as well: +1
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
