Re: Re: iconcache, v0.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:13:34AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Looks like Core folks won't settle for anything in between status-quo and 100% fix (no in-between-compromising like using xdg-utils), so let's give it a shot.

What is the 100% fix?

100% fix is loosely defined as satisfying the motivations/criteria outlined in the latest version of the proposal.

Note, however, that 100% fix is outside the scope of packaging guidelines. One thing that needs fixing wrt guidelines, however, is to not regenerate icon cache on every single package install, hence, why this newest version of the proposal drops the use of gtk-update-icon-cache in %post/%postun. On this, everyone from Core agrees (including Matthias, gtk maintainer).

-- Rex

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux