IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
- Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
- Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
- Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
- Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
- Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
- RE: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
- Re: appeal-otis-2009-02-16
- Re: [IAB] IASA irresponsibility? (was: Re: [Trustees] LastCall for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem)
- RE: IASA irresponsibility? (was: Re: [IAB] [Trustees] LastCall for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem)
- IASA irresponsibility? (was: Re: [IAB] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem)
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- [no subject]
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- RE: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
- Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
- Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG
- RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent")
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re:Referencesto Redphone's "patent")
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re:Referencesto Redphone's "patent")
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: Referencesto Redphone's "patent")
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent")
- Re: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- From: Michael B. Einschlag
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Settlement proposal - Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
- Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent")
- RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent")
- Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent")
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent")
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- Re: San Francisco IETF Code Sprint
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent")
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- IPR advice to avoid ignorant flame wars about patents
- Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
- Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
- Re: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
- Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
- Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
- Re: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
- Re: References to Redphone's "patent"
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- Re: References to Redphone's "patent"
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: References to Redphone's "patent"
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- Re: References to Redphone's "patent"
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- RE: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- From: Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: References to Redphone's "patent"
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
- Re: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- RE: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: References to Redphone's "patent"
- RE: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- From: Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- From: HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS
- RE: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- References to Redphone's "patent"
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- From: HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Please reject the patent-encumbered proposed standard for TLS authorization
- Re: On the best use of IETF resources with respect to IPR
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- On the best use of IETF resources with respect to IPR
- (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility)
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- RE: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: If you install Mail Filters how is the list integrity to be documented?
- Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility)
- RE: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility)
- Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility)
- Re: LORAN is making a comeback..
- Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility)
- Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility)
- Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility)
- Re: LORAN is making a comeback..
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility)
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: please do not publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
- Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: please do not publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- TLS Authz - Encumbered Standards are Not Standards
- TLS authorization and RedPhone Security patent
- Concern regarding Patented TLS Authorization spec
- Comments on TLS-authz
- Re: RE proposed standard draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- "TLS authorization" standard
- Re: Please reject the patent-encumbered proposed standard for TLS authorization
- TLS Standard problem
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: LORAN is making a comeback..
- Re: LORAN is making a comeback..
- Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: LORAN is making a comeback..
- Re: LORAN is making a comeback..
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- RE: IETF and open source license compatibility
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- LORAN is making a comeback..
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
- Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard
- TLS authz licensing problem
- Comment on TLS-authz proposal
- Re: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- From: Joachim Achtzehnter
- "TLS authorization"
- draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- No to patent emcumbered standards
- Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- From: Angelos D. Keromytis
- Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
- From: Rémi Denis-Courmont
- Re: IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
- IETF and open source license compatibility (Was: Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt)
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07
- Re: The Dean list
- DIME Phone Conference
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- ECRIT Phone Conference
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: If you install Mail Filters how is the list integrity to be documented?
- Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- RE: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- If you install Mail Filters how is the list integrity to be documented?
- Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: LC announcements -- lessons to be learned?
- Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
- please do not publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- We are against TLS
- Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions <draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt>
- Please say No to draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- TLS authorization standard
- RE proposed standard draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
- Please reject Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions
- Comment on proposed patent-encumbered TLS authorization standard
- Please do not approve TLS authorisation as a standard
- complains on Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions
- restricting access to standard protocol languages
- TLS authorization
- Do not approve patent-encumbered TLS auth standard
- Re: [A2k] TODAY/URGENT: Stop IETF Enactment of Patented Standard for TLS
- From: Jeffrey A. Williams
- Please don't patent TLS! (TLS-authz)
- TLS Authorization: Proposed Patent-Encumbered Standard
- FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions
- In protest of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- serious concerns on TLS authorization standard enclosure
- Reject the proposed TLS-authz standard
- TLS AUTHORIZATION STANDARD PROPOSAL
- TLS authorization
- Re: [PCN] Last Call: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture (Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Architecture) to Informational RFC
- Please do not approve standard for TLS authorization
- TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- standard for TLS authorisation
- RedPhone Patent On TLS Authorization
- Request for "TLS Authorization Extensions" Rejection
- Proposed TLS-authz standard
- re: (TLS) Authorization Extensions
- comments on IETF proposed "TLS authorization"
- opposing TLS-authz standardization
- No patent-encumbered standards, please.
- From: Ben Miller-Jacobson
- Comment on proposed TLS authorisation
- Comments opposing TLS-authz proposed standard
- How does the IETF work? (was:Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- LC announcements -- lessons to be learned?
- TLS authorization
- Writeup (not) [Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard]
- Re: patent threat for draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07
- Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jones-dime-3gpp-eps-command-codes (DiameterCommand Code Registration for Third Generation PartnershipProject (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)) to Informational RFC
- Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- The Dean list (was: It's time for some new steps)
- Re: patent threat for draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07
- Re: It's time for some new steps
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
- Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07
- Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07
- Re: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07
- RE: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07
- yet another comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
- Re: FW: [IP] TODAY: Stop IETF Enactment of Patented Standard for TLS
- RE: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- FW: [IP] TODAY: Stop IETF Enactment of Patented Standard for TLS
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-non-compound-08
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- RE: Last Call: draft-jones-dime-3gpp-eps-command-codes (DiameterCommand Code Registration for Third Generation PartnershipProject (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)) to Informational RFC
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jones-dime-3gpp-eps-command-codes (Diameter Command Code Registration for Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)) to Informational RFC
- draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Review of draft-ietf-tls-authz-extns-07
- TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07
- Re: Last Call: draft-jones-dime-3gpp-eps-command-codes (Diameter Command Code Registration for Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)) to Informational RFC
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Re: Please Review Draft IESG Statement on Activities that are OBE
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Patent-encumbered standards are not a good idea
- TLS authorization
- RedPhone "Patent"
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: It's time for some new steps
- FSF's ... warning about TLS
- Patent-Encumbered IETF Standard
- proposed TLS authz extension standard
- opposition to TLS-authz standard
- From: Yahoo.co.uk account
- Please don't Accept the Patent-Encumbered Standard for TLS Authorisation
- Re: TLS-authz standard
- NO! IETF patent-encumbered standard
- Please say NO to the TLS-authz standard
- FSF whinging (again)
- RE: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions
- patent threat for draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07
- Patents in the Standard
- About tls-authz-standard
- From: projects . gg . aaron
- Re TLS AUTHZ
- TLS AUTHZ
- Re: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- From: Pablo 'merKur' Kohan
- Internet Draft: Transport Layer Security (TLS) Evidence Extensions
- Scrub proposed patented standard for "TLS authorization"
- TLS authorisation
- Regarding TLS authorization
- I'm opposed to the proposed TLS-authz standard
- Don't accept a patent crippled TLS-auth
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Keep Standards Open
- From: McDowell, Perry (CIV)
- Comment to draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- TLS authorization
- showstopper defect in draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
- TLS Authorization Standard
- I am against the RedPhone Security as a IETF Standard
- patented standards
- TLS-authz proposal
- Please Do Not Approve the Proposed Patent-Encumbered Standard for TLS Authorization.
- draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
- about RedPhone TLS-autz
- From: Joshua Ismael Haase Hernández
- TLS authorisation proposal
- I oppose TLS authorization
- Request to refuse TLS authorization standard
- Concern with draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07
- Re: Please Review Draft IESG Statement on Activities that are OBE
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: FSF campaign against TLS-authz
- Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions
- Please do not approve patent-encumbered TLS authorisation standard
- TLS-authz standard
- Please REJECT proposal for "TLS authorization" standard
- Just say no to intellectual "property" encumbrance
- Opposing the TLS authorization standard
- IETF standards should not be patent-encumbered
- Re: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: The IESG that can so "no!"
- Comments on proposed TLS Authorisation Standard
- From: Alan Lord (The Open Learning Centre)
- Don't be a barrier to our freedom
- TLS-authz
- campaigns@xxxxxxx
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- The actual situation re. posting w/o subscribing
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- RE: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- Re: FWIW: guessing about draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- RE: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Ah, I see the cause of the situation now... (tls-authz situation)
- Re: Welcome to the "IETF Honest" list (now go home!)
- Re: Welcome to the "IETF Honest" list (now go home!)
- Re: Please Review Draft IESG Statement on Activities that are OBE
- Re: why to contact the IETF
- RE: why to contact the IETF
- Re: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- Re: why to contact the IETF
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- RE: why to contact the IETF
- Re: ideological opposition to patents
- Re: why to contact the IETF
- RE: why to contact the IETF
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- Re: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- RE: how to contact the IETF
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- RE: how to contact the IETF
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- RE: how to contact the IETF
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF
- Re: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- FSF campaign against TLS-authz
- Re: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF
- Re: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Letter sent to FSF, needs a follow-up...
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- RE: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: Eclipse plugin for authoring Internet-Drafts?
- RE: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Eclipse plugin for authoring Internet-Drafts?
- Re: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]
- Re: [Ietf-honest] It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest"mailing list])
- Re: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- List membership [Re: how to contact the IETF]
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- Re: TLS-auth
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest"mailing list])
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest"mailing list])
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
- Re: I Love this subject header! (was Re: Reject TLS!)
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: FSF whinging
- Re: FSF whinging
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: FSF whinging
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: how to contact the IETF
- Re: I Love this subject header! (was Re: Reject TLS!)
- Re: FSF whinging
- Re: FSF whinging
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 9, Issue 25
- Re: FSF whinging
- RE: FSF whinging
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Regarding Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- I Love this subject header! (was Re: Reject TLS!)
- Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF
- TLS auth
- Please establish patent-free standards
- TLS Authorisation Standard is Flawed
- Re: TLS authorization
- "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions" (draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07)
- Prevent approval of "TLS authorization"!
- TLS authorization
- Comments on IETF's TLS Authorization Standard
- TLS Authorization
- Patented TLS authorization technology
- I oppose the IETF approval of the RedPhone patent on a TLS authorization standard.
- From: Steven C. Morreale, M.D./M.P.H.
- TLS-authz draft
- Please reject the patented TLS-authz standard proposal.
- TLS Authorization standard proposal
- Re: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- FSF whinging
- Proposed TLS Authorization Standard
- TLS Authorization Extensions
- TLS standard
- IMHO
- From: Жилин Роман Дмитриевич
- Red Phone Patent
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Urgent: TLS authorization standard proposal
- On the TLS authorization proposed standard
- From: Pedro José Ponce de León
- TLS-auth
- TLS authorizing standard
- Request about: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1026/
- From: Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix -
- TLS authorization
- TLS Authorization.
- From: Olle & Susan Gladso
- TLS-authz standard and RedPhone patent
- TLS authorization standard patent
- RedPhone - TLS Authorisation - Patent Application
- patent and the TLS-Auth draft
- IETF should reject acceptance of TLS Authorization
- TLS Authorization Standard
- Please reject the patent-encumbered proposed standard for TLS authorization
- [no subject]
- Reject TLS Authz
- TLS-authz standard (ENTRAPMENT)
- Disapprove the TLS-authz standard
- From: Marco Antonio Mauro
- Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions
- Protest against adopting Protocol for TLS Authorization Patented by "RedPhone Security"
- Re: TLS-authz standard
- TLS-authz
- From: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
- TLS-authz
- Comments on the TLS-authz standard - please don't allow a standard patent-encumbered
- From: Jordi Burguet Castell
- proprietty technology should not be incorporated into internet standards (including RedPhone technology)
- Opposition to "standard" for TLS authorization from Turkey
- Reject TLS!
- Do not approve patent-encumbered TLS-authorization
- From: J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- TLS authorization proposed standard
- RedPhone patent
- TLS authorization
- Patent encumbered standards are unacceptable
- TLS-authorization standard
- TLS authorization
- stop TLS Authorisation on RedPhone Security
- Please Reject "TLS Authorization Extensions"
- TLS Authorisation
- questionable patent by RedPhone
- From: DonnaK Besser Stone
- TLS authorization
- Evaluation: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
- From: Dimitrios P. Bouras
- "TLS authorization" proposed standard
- TLS Standard Patent Issues
- red hat TLS authorization application
- Oppose Current TLS Authorization Standard
- From: Charles R. Partridge
- Against proposed TLS authorization standard
- Standards must not be patent-encumbered
- TLS authorization standard
- TLS-authz comments
- TLS authorization
- TLS
- regarding TSL authorization
- please reject attempt to standardize proprietary TLS authorization protocol
- "TLS Authorisation" disappointment
- TLS Auth Proposal
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: Please Review Draft IESG Statement on Activities that are OBE
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netconf-tls -06.txt
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netconf-tls-06.txt
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-non-compound-08
- Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- RE: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
- Re: Last Call: draft-farrel-rtg-common-bnf (Reduced Backus-Naur Form(RBNF) A Syntax Used in Various Protocol Specification toProposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-farrel-rtg-common-bnf (Reduced Backus-Naur Form(RBNF) A Syntax Used in Various Protocol Specification toProposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-farrel-rtg-common-bnf (Reduced Backus-Naur Form(RBNF) A Syntax Used in Various Protocol Specification toProposed Standard
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]
- Re: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- RE: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]
- RE: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]
- Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]
- Re: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]
- Re: Last Call: draft-farrel-rtg-common-bnf (Reduced Backus-Naur Form(RBNF) A Syntax Used in Various Protocol Specification toProposed Standard
- Re: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: Last Call: draft-farrel-rtg-common-bnf (Reduced Backus-Naur Form(RBNF) A Syntax Used in Various Protocol Specification toProposed Standard
- Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]
- Re: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
- Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]
- Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]
- Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]