In message <20090211233244.GA23152@localdomain>, Ward Vandewege writes: > Hi Noel, > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:39:19PM -0500, Noel Chiappa wrote: > > Thank you for being part of a crowd of hundreds of people who have mailbomb > ed > > the mailboxes of thousands of IETF 'members' (since we don't have any forma > l > > membership, just an email list). As a result, we all have such positive > > feeling about the FSF. > > I appreciate that's a problem. However, maybe that's a sign that perhaps next > time the IETF shouldn't *ask* for comments to be sent to the mailing list? > > The IESG is considering approving this draft as a standards track > RFC. The IESG solicits final comments on whether the IETF community has > consensus to publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns as a proposed > standard. Comments can be sent to ietf at ietf.org or exceptionally to > iesg at ietf.org. Comments should be sent by 2009-02-11. > > That's from > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg05617.html > > We all did exactly as you asked. If that caused problems, please consider > creating a separate mechanism for comments next time. But don't blame people > for following your guidelines. That's just silly. > > Thanks, > Ward. > > -- > JHV Consulting USA > Colocation, dedicated and virtual servers, hosting > http://jhvc.com > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf The message was sent to the "IETF community" for comment. It wasn't sent to the public for comment. It didn't request comments from the public. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf