Powers Chuck-RXCP20 <Chuck.Powers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If the technology in the document to be standardized is > unencumbered, then the fact that _some_ uses of that technology may > run into encumbered territory is irrelevant, except to those who > hate patents in general. I think software patents are a bad idea, and would prefer that there be none of them. I think software is like music, and patenting software is like patenting chords or melodies. Patents are the wrong legal tool for software, and they undermine the purpose of IPR (which is to promote "progress" of the "useful arts"). Nevertheless, I see no reason to oppose standardizing a protocol that is unencumbered by patents, simply because some uses of that protocol (even if they may be common) are encumbered. I think such opposition requires more than mere opposition to software patents, or to patents in general. At the very least, it also requires that one not think through the logical consequences of one's strategy. In practice, however, I believe most of the people who sent us drive-by mailings were simply misinformed or mistaken about the facts. -- Cos _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf