Dear Cullen;
On Feb 10, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
I've gotten a bit lost on all the changes. Would it be possible to
send to the list a single email that summarizes the current proposed
changes to the document published on the web sight? or just a new
copy of the document?
See
Draft Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents after Community Last
Call (2009-02-09)
in
http://trustee.ietf.org/policyandprocedures.html
Both redlined and a clean copy are provided, in both pdf and MS word
for each.
Regards
Marshall
On Feb 9, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Contreras, Jorge wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Narten [mailto:narten@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 6:23 PM
To: Marshall Eubanks
Cc: Contreras, Jorge; Trustees; SM; ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed
work-around to thePre-5378 Problem
NEW PROPOSED
c. Derivative Works and Publication Limitations. If a
Contributor
desires to limit the right to make modifications
and derivative
s/desires/needs/
I don't think that "desires" is appropriate here - as John pointed
out, the contributor has no discretion here, except for their
judgement as to whether rights are available.
Actually, in this case, it is the submitters choice, since we are
talking about case (i) or (ii) (and not (iii) which has been the
challenging case). And "desires" is the wording that has been used
here for a while.
But that said, a more neutral term is fine by me, since the
motivations for needing to select this may vary.
How about "chooses"?
Thomas
"chooses" is fine with me
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Trustees mailing list
Trustees@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trustees
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf