Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to thePre-5378 Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




I've gotten a bit lost on all the changes. Would it be possible to send to the list a single email that summarizes the current proposed changes to the document published on the web sight? or just a new copy of the document?

On Feb 9, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Contreras, Jorge wrote:



-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Narten [mailto:narten@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 6:23 PM
To: Marshall Eubanks
Cc: Contreras, Jorge; Trustees; SM; ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed
work-around to thePre-5378 Problem

NEW PROPOSED

  c. Derivative Works and Publication Limitations.  If a
Contributor
     desires to limit the right to make modifications
and derivative

s/desires/needs/

I don't think that "desires" is appropriate here - as John pointed
out, the contributor has no discretion here, except for their
judgement as to whether rights are available.

Actually, in this case, it is the submitters choice, since we are
talking about case (i) or (ii) (and not (iii) which has been the
challenging case).  And "desires" is the wording that has been used
here for a while.

But that said, a more neutral term is fine by me, since the
motivations for needing to select this may vary.

How about "chooses"?

Thomas

"chooses" is fine with me
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]