On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 05:57:28AM -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote: > And the question is: did all those people writing in read and understand > the draft and fully understand the issue? Or are they just > regurgitating a "do this" announcement. How do you weigh a bunch of > uninformed responses against a fewer number of informed ones. Surely that's a decision that has to be made by the shepherd of the document? I know that when I have to evaluate the consensus in a WG, figuring out whether someone's objections are ill-informed is one of my jobs. Sometimes that involves asking follow-up questions to the person who posts. (Like, for instance, "Have you read this draft?") A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf