Stephen Kent wrote:
At 9:00 PM -0800 2/19/09, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Just as a matter of observation, ...
...
I have not read the doc in
question,...
Hey guys. As someone who is frequently faced with trying to parse out what are
and are not the commonly held views among the security community, I'm actually
interested in this type of exchange.
But as you both note, this exchange isn't critical to resolution of the the
appeal.
For those of who want to see this appeal dispatched as quickly and as painlessly
as possible, is there a chance that you can continue the exchange under a
different guise, at a minimum under an entirely independent thread?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf