Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Aaron Williamson wrote:

> ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I completely disagree with this assessment. The points you mention are quite
>> specifically talking about Agreements, not certificates.
>
> Yes, this is obviously right, "Agreements" are not certificates.  But I don't
> think it's clear that storing Agreements covers only "a fairly specific set of

Hmmmm, my interpretation would be that a certificate is in fact
documentation of an agreement between the CA and the owner/user of the
cert. I see no distinction between 'agreements' and 'certificates' in this
context.

Again, the term "agreement" in this context has a specific meaning given in
item 2. IMO certs do not fit this definition. They're not even close.

				Ned
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]