Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ray,

> > NEW:
> >
> >    iii. If a Contribution includes Pre-5378 Material and the
> >    Contributor is unable (for whatever reason) to obtain the
> >    necessary permissions to allow modifications of such Pre-5378
> >    Material to be made outside the IETF Standards Process:

> The language suggests a tasking to obtain 5378 licenses from
> contributors of pre-5378 material.  I think that is something we
> want to avoid.  I think the following language obtains the same
> results but with less stress on the participants.

I agree, but that might also be seen to be getting closer to
overruling what RFC 5378 says, something that I understand to be out
of scope.

> iii. If a Contribution includes Pre-5378 Material for which the
>     Contributor of the pre-5378 material has not or may not have
>     granted the necessary permissions to the IETF Trust to allow
>     modifications of such Pre-5378 Material to be made outside the
>     IETF Standards Process:

IMO, this is improved wording I support it.

Thanks,
Thomas
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]