--On Friday, February 06, 2009 10:30 -0500 Thomas Narten
<narten@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But for case iii), there are two "contributors" at issue. The
> one submitting the document, and possible pre-5378
> contributors who's text has been included in the document.
>...
> For case iii), it should remain clear that the document
> author/contributor is agreeing to the full 5378 coverage for
> his/her contribution (made subequent to 5378), but that they
> take no position regarding the pre-5378 text that may have
> been incorporated.
>...
Yes. I thought I pointed this distinction out weeks ago, but
perhaps I'm losing my mind. The goal is not to exempt authors
from asserting their own compliance to 5378, but to avoid their
having to make any assertions on behalf of others (or even to
explicitly identify those other beyond our normal requirements
for acknowledgement).
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf