> > NEW PROPOSED > > > > c. Derivative Works and Publication Limitations. If a Contributor > > desires to limit the right to make modifications and derivative > s/desires/needs/ > I don't think that "desires" is appropriate here - as John pointed > out, the contributor has no discretion here, except for their > judgement as to whether rights are available. Actually, in this case, it is the submitters choice, since we are talking about case (i) or (ii) (and not (iii) which has been the challenging case). And "desires" is the wording that has been used here for a while. But that said, a more neutral term is fine by me, since the motivations for needing to select this may vary. How about "chooses"? Thomas _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf