Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>   http://www.ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/appeal-otis-2009-02-16.txt

This appeal boils down to "someone might misuse it so don't
standardize it."  Is there any standard to which someone couldn't have
made a similar objection?

Much of the bad stuff they say about SPF and Sender-ID is correct, but
it'll be equally true whether or not a header reports the results.

I have reviewed the draft and find it to be technically sound.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor
"More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]