On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:29:05 -0800 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Could I just point out here the real risk that this relevant > objection might get lost in the sea of irrelevant aggitation from the > FSF supporters? > I agree. Let's move the substantive discussion to the TLS WG mailing list, or at least agree on some "secret" keyword to put into Subject: lines that I can use for better filtering; I'm on the verge of kill-filing anything with "authz" or "TLS" or "patent", at least if they appear on the IETF list... --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf