> >So you've done the equivalent of submit Windows source code and assume > >that it can be ported to a Unix system "left as an exercise to the > >reader".... care to give a detailed suggestion about *how* it could > >be revised to work with the IETF's more open procedures, and still be > >useful in terms of meeting your stated goals? > I wasn't kidding when I said submit a draft. Neither was I. > I realize that the chances of a significant change to the IETF's IPR > policy are pretty slim, but if we find nobody finds it important > enough to spend an hour throwing together a draft describing what he > thinks we should do, we can stop now. +1 Ned _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf