Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>If the technology is deployed by 100% of the community providing 
>professional email operations, both on the sending and the receiving 
>sides, as Dave expects, ...

I'm not Dave, but I cannot imagine where you got the idea that he
expects the "community providing professional email operation" to
deploy 100% of anything.

The idea that big mail systems will form a cartel and lock out people
who won't pay is just silly to anyone who remembers the history of
e-mail.  There used to be lots of closed commercial email systems,
including AOL, Compuserve, and MCI Mail where Dave worked.  Without
exception, they all were swept away by Internet mail which was cheap,
universal, and unmetered, even though in some ways it was technically
inferior to those systems.  Some of them, like AOL, morphed into ISPs,
others like MCI Mail just died.

If some group wanted to build a closed pay-to-play mail system, they
could do it with the tools they already have, using SMTP AUTH or
STARTTLS with a private signing cert or VPNs or whatever.  The reason
they don't is that it makes no sense, and a tiny tweak like VBR isn't
going to change that.

Is there any possibility that you are confusing threats that are easy
to imagine with threats that are likely?  Because this one isn't likely.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]