On 2/11/09 9:47 AM, "Powers Chuck-RXCP20" <Chuck.Powers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am curious - is this a commitment by the TLS chairs to actually work > on this document? Or simply an attempt to prevent the IESG from > advancing a document that the WG previously declined to work on, and > could easily do so again? I have no idea what Eric is thinking but I do think that the environment has changed and that there's now a lot more interest in authorization than there was a few years ago. That is to say, I think there are more people who'd be able and/or inclined to work on progressing the document. Melinda _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf