--On Friday, February 06, 2009 20:59 -0500 Tony Hansen
<tony@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Going back to RFC 2205,
>
> These rules are specified using Backus-Naur Form (BNF)
> augmented with square brackets surrounding optional
> sub-sequences.
>
> What do you think of BNFO, for "Backus-Naur Form with Options"?
>
> or BNFB, for "Backus-Naur Form with Brackets"?
Either one would work for me and would be much more descriptive
of what is going on than "Reduced".
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf