Hi - It might be a bit more credible if they offered a plausible alternative technology. Have they said when they'll post their I-D (meeting all RFC 5378 requirements, of course)? Randy > From: "AJ Jaghori" <ciscoworkz@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "mshore" <mshore@xxxxxxxxx>; "Jeffrey Hankins" <jhankin1@xxxxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; <campaigns@xxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:41 PM > Subject: Re: I Love this subject header! (was Re: Reject TLS!) > > Lol :) > > Its an interesting attempt, to say the least... > > > > On 2/9/09, mshore <mshore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2/8/09 11:22 AM, "Jeffrey Hankins" <jhankin1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Please stand up for software freedom and reject the TLS proposal until > >> RedPhone Security issues a royalty-free patent for TLS. Thank you. > > > > And the content cracks me way the heck up, too. Otherwise > > this is really, really annoying. What, these people think > > the IETF takes votes? > > > > Melinda > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > AJ Jaghori > Chief Architect, Author, & Professor | Data Network & Security > ciscoworkz@xxxxxxxxx > "Sent via my Android Powered Mobile..." > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf