IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-forces-model-14
- SECDIR review of draft-ietf-forces-model-14
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- RE: IETF copying conditions
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt
- Nomcom nominations not encrypted and e-mailed back in clear text
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Fwd: Call for discussion ofdraft-dawkins-nomcom-3777-issues-00
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: IETF Chair / IESG Chair / General Area nomination
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: Incumbent conflict of interest
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- RE: Incumbent conflict of interest
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- jodell2@xxxxxxx is no longer with CSC
- Re: Incumbent conflict of interest
- RE: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- IETF Chair / IESG Chair / General Area nomination
- Incumbent conflict of interest
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Application Area nominations (Was: On being public)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: When will the actual NOMCOM questionnaire come out?
- When will the actual NOMCOM questionnaire come out?
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: LastCall: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve EmailFiltering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: The RFC Editor and the Internet Standards Process
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Encoding of extention marker
- Re: [rfc-i] The RFC Editor and the Internet Standards Process
- The RFC Editor and the Internet Standards Process
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Request for review and consensus -- draft-hartman-webauth-phishing
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Re: Request for review and consensus -- draft-hartman-webauth-phishing
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-forces-mib (ForCES MIB) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF.org does its part on internationalization
- RE: IETF.org does its part on internationalization
- Re: IETF.org does its part on internationalization
- IETF.org does its part on internationalization
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro (Netnews Architecture and Protocols) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-forces-model-14.txt
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-forces-model-14.txt
- Test, please ignore
- Update on the Mail List Issue
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-forces-model-14.txt
- Fw: not the Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- IETF Mailing List Issue
- Re: not the Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: not the Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Re: Chrome and NoteWell?
- Chrome and NoteWell?
- Re: not the Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Unicode.org, ICANN.org & IETF.org
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- displinary process issues...
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Question regarding domain name in a web URL
- Question regarding domain name in a web URL
- From: darshan . karandikar
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: addition of IPR FIlings Link on WG Web Pages
- addition of IPR FIlings Link on WG Web Pages
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- RE: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- IETF72, IPv6 Panel Report
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- I18n of I-Ds (was Simpler than...)
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- RE: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: 73rd IETF - Registration
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: 73rd IETF - Registration
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt
- Re: 73rd IETF - Registration
- Re: 73rd IETF - Registration
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: 73rd IETF - Registration
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Archives for closed WGs
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Minneapolis IETF Code Sprint
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam blowback issues - Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Removal of nonsensical IETF patent disclosures
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: BCP or RFC references
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Flame on random process documents (was: Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6)
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Last Call: draft-manner-router-alert-iana (IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Option) to Proposed Standard
- Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Last Call: draft-manner-router-alert-iana (IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Option) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: BCP or RFC references
- Re: Last Call: draft-manner-router-alert-iana (IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Option) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments"
- Re: BCP or RFC references
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Last Call: draft-manner-router-alert-iana (IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Option) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: lateral approach to SS7/VoIP over satellite
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam blowback issues - Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Failing of IPR Filing Page when makling updates in re LTANS and other filings.
- Re: Failing of IPR Filing Page when makling updates in re LTANS and other filings.
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: lateral approach to SS7/VoIP over satellite
- Re: BCP or RFC references
- Re: several messages
- Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
- Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- [OT] Note Well (was: lateral approach to SS7/VoIP over satellite)
- BCP or RFC references (was: RE: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6)
- Re: Failing of IPR Filing Page when makling updates in re LTANS and other filings.
- Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
- lateral approach to SS7/VoIP over satellite
- RE: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
- RE: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: lateral approach to SS7/VoIP over satellite
- Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
- lateral approach to SS7/VoIP over satellite
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Failing of IPR Filing Page when makling updates in re LTANS and other filings.
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments"
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
- RE: Failing of IPR Filing Page when makling updates in re LTANS andother filings.
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
- RE: Failing of IPR Filing Page when makling updates in re LTANS andother filings.
- Re: Failing of IPR Filing Page when makling updates in re LTANS and other filings.
- Failing of IPR Filing Page when makling updates in re LTANS and other filings.
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
- Prague (ietf-68) t-shirt laundry mix-up.
- Mixed case (was: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist)
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: Improvements for IETF 72
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- ID desires and TOOLS stuff [was: Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist]
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
- Improvements for IETF 72
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Happy Birthday, IPv6
- Do you all have a lif? [was: Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist (resend)]
- RE: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist (resend)
- From: DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS
- Fw: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist (resend)
- Fw: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist (resend)
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: Strong Opposition due to blowback issues - Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Strong Opposition due to blowback issues - Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments ondraft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments ondraft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- RE: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments ondraft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- RE: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- RE: [Capwap] [Gen-art] IETF LC review:draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07
- From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- RE: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- RE: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- RE: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC review: draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07
- Re: avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills)
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- RE: [Gen-art] IETF LC review: draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07
- From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC review: draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07
- Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: "reality" vs. "principle" (was Re: About IETF communication skills)
- Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Last Call: draft-reschke-webdav-search (Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) SEARCH) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- From: Matthew J Zekauskas
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- RE: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- RE: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills)
- Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon
- Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon
- RE: About IETF communication skills
- Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon
- Re: avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills)
- Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon
- Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon
- Re: avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills)
- Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon
- MP3 support for Friday afternoon
- Proposals to improve the scribe situation
- Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills)
- Re: Disappointing to not have plenary slides online for remote participants...
- Re: Be aware when traveling to the USA.
- Re: Be aware when traveling to the USA.
- Re: Be aware when traveling to the USA.
- avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills)
- Re: "reality" vs. "principle" (was Re: About IETF communication skills)
- Fwd: Current Nomcom selection status
- Re: Be aware when traveling to the USA.
- Be aware when traveling to the USA.
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- "reality" vs. "principle" (was Re: About IETF communication skills)
- There are several flaws in RFC 3934 's Suspension Processes require Notice when a Suspension is Lifted.
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: Disappointing to not have plenary slides online for remote participants...
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- 2009 Venues & Hosts Set
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- RE: About IETF communication skills
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- RE: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- RE: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- RE: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Re: Disappointing to not have plenary slides online for remote participants...
- Re: About IETF communication skills
- Webpages for Hiroshima info
- Disappointing to not have plenary slides online for remote participants...
- About IETF communication skills
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream
- Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?
- Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?
- Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?
- Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?
- Re: IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream
- Re: IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream
- RE: [Capwap] Last call comments for capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07
- From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
- RE: [Capwap] Last call comments for capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07
- From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
- RE: [Capwap] Last call comments for capwap-threat-analysis-01
- IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream
- IAB's Introduction to the Wed Technical Plenary
- Re: FYA: I bet this will confuse a few users...
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- FYA: I bet this will confuse a few users...
- Re: GEOPRIV and ECRIT experiments at IETF 72
- GEOPRIV and ECRIT experiments at IETF 72
- Last call comments for capwap-threat-analysis-01
- Need XP recovery, anyone have the CD?
- Last call comments for capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07
- Re: Missing Materials
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
- Racom Card Found
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits)
- RE: [Capwap] Last call comments for capwap-protocol-specification-11
- From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits)
- RE: request for comments -- how to?
- request for comments -- how to?
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits)
- Re: NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair
- Re: NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair
- Found Safeword Platinum tokencard
- NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair
- Re: Chairs: Helping out remote participants
- Chairs: Helping out remote participants
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] Late Last Call comments: draft-ietf-krb-wg-anonymous
- RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] Late Last Call comments: draft-ietf-krb-wg-anonymous
- RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] Late Last Call Comment: draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-04.txt
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-04.txt
- Last call comments for capwap-protocol-specification-11
- IETF-75: sailing to Stockholm
- Re: Draft IAOC Administrative Policy
- Re: Draft IAOC Administrative Policy
- Re: Missing Materials
- Draft IAOC Administrative Policy
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
- Last Call comments on draft-sanchez-webdav-current-principal-01
- Audio Streaming - IETF 72 July 27th - August 1st
- Re: Missing Materials
- Re: Missing Materials
- Re: Missing Materials
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Missing Materials
- Re: Teleconf [Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73]
- Re: Missing Materials
- Re: Missing Materials
- Teleconf [Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73]
- Re: Missing Materials
- Missing Materials
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]