Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...
Using an absolute URI is not common practice in HTTP for anything other than requests to proxies. However, RFC 2616 requires that servers understand and support absolute URIs (Sec. 5.1.2). In my experience, this is a safe thing to assume; HTTP servers generally treat the URI sensibly.
...

I did some more investigation, and...

1) RFC2616 also states: "...even though HTTP/1.1 clients will only generate them in requests to proxies." -- which means, you can't use a conforming HTTP/1.1 client to produce them.

2) I tested with Apache 2.2.8, which seems to ignore the scheme. That seems to be a bug (raised: <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45579>).

3) I also tested with MS IIS 5.1, which immediately produces a 501 status for unknown schemes.

BR, Julian
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]