Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yes, but it doesn't change the fact that our rules (both old and > proposed new) only allow two very specific deviations from the > grant of license for derivative works. Agreed. I assumed Chuck talked about patent disclosures when he said "IPR disclosure", and then he would be correct that they can say anything and the language in them will likely change given the new policies. I assume you interpreted him as meaning copyright disclosure, and then he would be wrong as you explained; there are only very limited copyright choices when contributing anything to the IETF. Re-reading what he wrote, I'm not sure what he intended. Another reason to avoid the term "IPR"... /Simon _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf