On 7 aug 2008, at 10.56, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
If a new URI scheme is defined, it needs to state what it
identifies, and how it is resolved. If it identifies an HTTP
resource, and resolution is done via HTTP, then it seems to me you
don't need it.
Note: I totally disagree.
I detest, abhor and condemn the idea that there is such a thing as a
"HTTP resource".
An URI identifies a resource.
FWIW: I agree with this. A URI is an identifier. Some of them might be
possible to resolve using for example information given by the URI
scheme, but that is definitely not a requirement. And it has never
been one either.
Patrik
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf