Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrik Fältström wrote:
...
FWIW: I agree with this. A URI is an identifier. Some of them might be possible to resolve using for example information given by the URI scheme, but that is definitely not a requirement. And it has never been one either.
...

Just for the record: I agree with this, and didn't say anything else.

BR, Julian
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]