OK... >>Summary: This document is very close to ready for publication as a >>Proposed >>Standard. I have two technical comments below, but both are minor issues >>that could resolved in AUTH48 if you think they have merit. > > An aside: The purpose of AUTH48 state is not (should not be) to resolve > even minor issues. Ideally, no issues should arise in AUTH48, but the > world is not a perfect place. But let's not get in the habit of sweeping > minor changes to the every end of the publication process. The revision > process is pretty cheap. Agreed. I've been seeing a lot of Gen-ART reviewers, including myself, who say "could be resolved in AUTH48" as a unit of size, but I can see how reasonable people assume that it's a suggestion of tactics :-) Thanks for the opportunity to break old habits when they become even less reasonable. Spencer _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf