Olaf Kolkman rote: > Personally I would like to see that whatever document enters into > the RFC-Production function (to use the terminology from the RFC > Editor model[*]) has a clean copy in the repository. That allows for > a very clean interface between the streams and the RFC-producer. So, > I would argue that the result of (iv) is always posted. Based on my (quite short) experience as AD so far, it seems document authors vary greatly in how fast they can update the document and submit it (once the text has been agreed). I've seen this done in less than 10 minutes (sometimes before the IESG telechat ended). I've seen cases where it has taken several months. In cases where the time is measured in weeks (relatively common) or months (fortunately rare), just sending the RFC Editor note (and not waiting for updated clean copy) saves time, especially considering that the RFC Editor processes documents quite fast nowadays. (I do agree that having a clean copy would be nice, though.) Best regards, Pasi _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf