To John and Steve, >> It occurs to me that people may have been saying "could be >> resolved in AUTH48" when they really meant "could be resolved in >> an RFC Editor note". I would not be a bit surprised if I meant that ;-) > Personally, I don't even like RFC Editor notes for things that can and > should be corrected by the author. As both an author and an AD, I much > preferred clean new copies. My own AD feels the same way, for reasonable reasons. I do note that spinning revisions also activates all the review team reviewers to figure out what's changed since (in this case) 07. It's worth noting that although the ID submission tool has made submitting a 08 version very cheap, it's not free... Thanks. Spencer _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf