--On Monday, August 11, 2008 12:54 AM +0200 Henrik Levkowetz
<henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And this is precisely one of the examples to which I was
referring, because, in exceptional circumstances, the RFC
Editor has been willing to negotiate that limit. However,
if my memory is correct, the "nits" checker, which draws its
authority from the Checklist, gets sufficiently annoyed
about more than five authors to prevent posting of I-Ds.
Umm???
If you're referring to idnits, it does no test the number of
authors
in any way or form. I haven't checked whether the current,
soon-to
be replaced submission tool tries to check this, but idnits
does most emphatically not.
I apologize to idnits. I have seen documents rejected by some
process because they had more than five authors, but I don't
remember whether it was the submission tool or someone
overzealous at the (present or past) Secretariat.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf