Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
...
Ok. Which leaves establishing the desired behaviour of the draft
submission mechanisms.
My personal viewpoint is that it would be inappropriate to strictly
enforce a limit of 5 authors. The use of 'should' in section 2.2,
item 2 of the current document ('There should not be more than 5
authors/editors') seems appropriate given the current RFC Editor
policy, and tools-wise this would then be implemented as a note or
warning at the most, but should never cause a refusal to accept a draft
submission.
...
+1
BR, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf