----- Original Message -----
From: "TS Glassey" <tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <iesg@xxxxxxxx>; <ipr-wg@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: <chair@xxxxxxxx>; "Contreras, Jorge" <Jorge.Contreras@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 8:09 AM
Subject: Suspension Processes require Notice when a Suspension is Lifted.
Folks -
when the IETF lifts a Suspension just doing it and neglecting to announce
that the individual who was suspended is an act which can only be reviewed
as 'an attempt by the WG Chair to keep that person off that list' and in
doing so, and one would think that this opens the Sponsor's and the IETF
itself to more pain.
This is true since suspensions are announced on the list itself.
--- snip ---
In summary, if the IETF notices the party who is suspended when posting
rights are removed then they MUST notice as well when the rights are
restored. Nothing else is ethical or reasonable...
Also when an appeal is acted on, someone needs to say something to the
person who filed that appeal.
The purpose here is disclosure...
Right? - so who is that and when is it said?
We need both of these flow-issues addressed in that process.
---
Personal Disclaimers Apply
TS Glassey
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf