Fred Baker wrote:
I seem to be in the minority, but I object.
...
In the latter case - the case under dispute - I disagree with the sense
of this rule. I think the important thing is clarity, and clarity is
enhanced by not changing text whose sense isn't actually being changed.
+1
d/
ps. I guess this all settles the question about whether the Checklist mandates
its own set of formal requirements on RFC content. This entire discussion is
about something that is not mandated anywhere else. No other BCP, RFC, or RFC
Editor document.
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf