--On Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:36 PM -0400 Tony Hansen <tony@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I think it would be better to use phrasing like this: BCP 32 (currently RFC 2606)
And that, of course, has yet a different meaning, although probably nearly the same one as the "2606 and successors" version does.
john _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf