Lisa: >> Before that failure, there's the problem that a GET to a HELD server >> requires a custom body. A GET without that body is undefined (in the last >> spec version I remember). Julian: > Oh, I thought it uses POST, but maybe I missed something. Section 9 of draft-08 seems to specify behavior for GET and body-less POST as "MUST attempt to provide either a PIDF/LO document or a Location URI". Now, I don't know what "attempt" means in that context, but leaving that point aside, it sounds to me like that's leaning into a direction that could make the spec work perfectly well with a browser as a client, assuming there's a handler for application/held+xml. The example in 11.1 uses a GET message without a body. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@xxxxxx> +33-4-89063488 _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf