Frank Ellermann wrote:
John C Klensin wrote:
My hope is that we can discuss and figure out whether
the community likes and will accept the general idea.
What *is* the general idea ? If it's "attaching" one
or more figures / images to an RFC I'm fine with it.
Technical detail, for some years we could still stay
within the limits of 8+3 like so:
rfc5555.txt, rfc555a.svg, rfc5555b.gif, rfc5555d.png
...
Frank,
if you feel that 8+3 is a limit we need to consider, what's your opinion
on the naming convention for internet drafts?
BR, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf