On Jul 24, 2008, at 9:39 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
As I have done for previous IETFs I just ran getdrafts
(http://tools.ietf.org/tools/getdrafts/) on the entire agenda
and what follows is the output. As you can see, a pretty substantial
number of WGs are without agendas, about 10% of the drafts listed
are wrong, and about half of those appear to be simple version
errors.
...
draft-willis-sip-infopackage-00.txt (wg=sip)
Or it could be that I put a draft that expired 4 years ago (but is
still in our various secondary servers) on the reading list for a
discussion, because it's pretty annoying that we're still trying to
decide on whether or not we have consensus to fix the problem 4 years
later.
Since the agenda I posted is HTML and the draft is linked into that
agenda (which everybody SHOULD do, I believe), I suspect it's a
question of the getdrafts tool not doing the right thing. Perhaps it
should use the agenda's link if there is one?
Also, drafts are often revised after agenda are posted. Maybe
getdrafts should just pull the latest version?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf