IETF Discussion

Date Index

[Prev Page][Next Page]

Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, (continued)
Fw: just look at that, bensons
Proposed modification of IPR notice inside each ID/RFC, tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gen-ART IETF Telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12, Dale R. Worley
IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, IAOC Chair
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Adam Roach
  - Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Melinda Shore
  - Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
    - Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Paul Wouters
      - Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, kathleen . moriarty . ietf
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, nalini.elkins
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Paul Wouters
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Jari Arkko
    - Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Eric Rescorla
      - Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, John C Klensin
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Michal Krsek
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, John Levine
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, John C Klensin
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Lixia Zhang
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Loa Andersson
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, nalini.elkins
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Behcet Sarikaya
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Andrew Allen
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, lloyd.wood
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Michal Krsek
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, John C Klensin
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, l.wood
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Toerless Eckert
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Dave Crocker
        
        RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, John E Drake
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Jari Arkko
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Paul Wouters
        
        RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Christian Huitema
        
        build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input], Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input], nalini.elkins
        
        Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input], kathleen . moriarty . ietf
        
        Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input], nalini.elkins
        
        Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input], Alia Atlas
        
        Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input], kathleen . moriarty . ietf
        
        Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input], HANSEN, TONY L
        
        Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input], Michael Richardson
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, lloyd.wood
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Bob Hinden
    - Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Randall Gellens
  - Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Margaret Cullen
    - Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Sam Hartman
      - Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, lloyd.wood
        
        Re: Havana and Juggalos (was: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input), Theodore V Faber
        
        Re: Havana and Juggalos (was: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input), JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
  - IAOC response to question of clarification Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Leslie Daigle
    - Re: IAOC response to question of clarification Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, S Moonesamy
IESG meeting thoughts, IETF Chair
- Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Bert Wijnen (IETF)
  - Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Randy Bush
    - Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Bert Wijnen (IETF)
    - Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      - Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Phillip Hallam-Baker
    - Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Michael Richardson
      - Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Nico Williams
        
        Re: IESG meeting thoughts, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Code Sprint in Berlin, IETF Chair
Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12, Dale R. Worley
- Re: Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12, Jari Arkko
  - Re: Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12, Martin Bjorklund
Sad news: Prof.Suguru Yamaguchi passed on May 9th, 2016, Hiroshi Esaki
- Re: Sad news: Prof.Suguru Yamaguchi passed on May 9th, 2016, David Conrad
The ecosystem is moving, Stephane Bortzmeyer
- 答复: The ecosystem is moving, Hejianfei (Jeffrey)
- Re: The ecosystem is moving, Paul Wouters
  - Re: The ecosystem is moving, Dave Cridland
    - Re: The ecosystem is moving, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      - Re: The ecosystem is moving, Martin Rex
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Paul Wouters
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Alia Atlas
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, John Levine
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Matthew Kerwin
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Richard Shockey
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Richard Shockey
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, ned+ietf
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, John Levine
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: The ecosystem is moving, Dave Cridland
- Re: The ecosystem is moving, Nico Williams
xml2rfc.ietf.org down?, Adrian Farrel
- Re: xml2rfc.ietf.org down?, Carsten Bormann
  - Re: xml2rfc.ietf.org down?, Henrik Levkowetz
Topics in IETF leadership team retreats, IETF Chair
IETF registration fees..., Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF registration fees..., John Levine
  - Re: IETF registration fees..., Michael Richardson
  - Re: IETF registration fees..., Mary Barnes
    - Re: IETF registration fees..., Phillip Hallam-Baker
IETF 96 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Now Open!, IETF Secretariat
- Re: IETF 96 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Now Open!, Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
Update on Remote Mentoring: Internet Draft Review Teams, nalini.elkins
IETF 96 To Open for Registration Soon, IETF Administrative Director
IAB sent comments on ICANN draft bylaws, IAB Chair
CFP: ACM, IRTF & ISOC Applied Networking Research Workshop 2016, Eggert, Lars
Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10, Peter Yee
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10, Jari Arkko
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10, Pushpasis Sarkar
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10, Pushpasis Sarkar
Appointment to the Internet Society Board of Trustees, Ted Hardie
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Appointment to the Internet Society Board of Trustees, IAB Chair
  - Message not available
    - Re: Appointment to the Internet Society Board of Trustees, Stefan Buhrmester
      - Re: Appointment to the Internet Society Board of Trustees, Kalilou Dama
Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-08, Peter Yee
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-08, Pushpasis Sarkar
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-08, Pushpasis Sarkar
  - RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-08, Peter Yee
    - Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-08, Pushpasis Sarkar
Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard, Tom Harrison
- Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard, Brian Haberman
  - Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush
    - Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard, Brian Haberman
  - Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard, Sandra Murphy
    - Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard, Sandra Murphy
Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06, Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06, Jari Arkko
Grants for Cybersecurity in Africa, LAC and AP regions, Carlos M. Martinez
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-05.txt> (Requirements for Subscription to YANG Datastores) to Proposed Standard, tom p.
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-05.txt> (Requirements for Subscription to YANG Datastores) to Proposed Standard, Eric Voit (evoit)
IETF-95 summary articles, IETF Chair
- Re: [95all] IETF-95 summary articles, Linda Klieforth
- Re: [95all] IETF-95 summary articles, Linda Klieforth
Community Input Requested on Update to Trust Records Retention Policy, IETF Administrative Director
A kwik brcwn fcks jamps ovur ya leizi dcg ( Developer seeks FUNDING ), Casey Farrell
Re: draft-arkko-ietf-trends-and-observations-00, nalini.elkins
Spam catcher, Howard Hong
- Re: Spam catcher, Dave Cridland
- Re: Spam catcher, John Levine
  - Re: Spam catcher, Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat.com)
RE: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Adrian Farrel
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Adrian Farrel
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, John C Klensin
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Barry Leiba
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, John C Klensin
      - Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Scott Bradner
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Barry Leiba
      - Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Donald Eastlake
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Barry Leiba
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Barry Leiba
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Barry Leiba
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Joe Touch
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Barry Leiba
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Joe Touch
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Barry Leiba
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Ben Campbell
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, Gmail
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice, S Moonesamy
Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Melinda Shore
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Mary Barnes
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, nalini.elkins
  - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
    - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, nalini.elkins
Re: [aqm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11.txt> (AQM Characterization Guidelines) to Informational RFC, Dave Täht
- Re: [aqm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11.txt> (AQM Characterization Guidelines) to Informational RFC, Wesley Eddy
Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03, Russ Housley
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03 (Was: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03), Jari Arkko
- Re: Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03, Martin Thomson
A word about mailing lists Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration, Leslie Daigle
Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration, The IAOC
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback â?? for sites currently under active consideration, Dan Harkins
  - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Melinda Shore
    - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Dan Harkins
    - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, John Levine
    - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, nalini.elkins
      - Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Corinne Cath
        
        Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Abdussalam Baryun
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration (off-topic), S Moonesamy
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration (off-topic), Corinne Cath
    - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Christian O'Flaherty
      - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, nalini.elkins
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Melinda Shore
        
        f2f and mailing list participation - a question for "newer" participants (Was: Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: f2f and mailing list participation - a question for "newer" participants (Was: Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration), Joseph Lorenzo Hall
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Vinayak Hegde
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Harald Alvestrand
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, thomas nadeau
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, John Levine
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Abdussalam Baryun
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Stephan Wenger
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Christian O'Flaherty
    - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Adam Roach
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Yoav Nir
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Ross Finlayson
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration, lloyd.wood
  - RE: Interim step on meetings site feedback â€” for sites currently under active consideration, Andrew Allen
  - Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback â€” for sites currently under active consideration, Jari Arkko
- RE: [Recentattendees] Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration, fred.clark
Nominations sought: Jonathan B. Postel Service Award 2016, IETF Administrative Director
Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08, Peter Yee
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08, vinays
  - Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08, vinays
    - Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08, Jari Arkko
Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06, Peter Yee
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06, Dhruv Dhody
  - Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06, Jari Arkko
Re: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section) to Best Current Practice, Paul Hoffman
spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd), paul
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd), Dick Franks
- Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
  - Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John Leslie
    - Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, David Morris
      - Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, ietf
        
        Re: [89attendees] spam on old lists - was Fw: new important message, Carlos M. Martinez
        
        Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, Benson Schliesser
        
        Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John R Levine
        
        Re: [89attendees] spam on old lists - was Fw: new important message, Dick Franks
    - Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
      - Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, John Leslie
        
        Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
        
        Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees], Jared Mauch
IETF95 Mentoring Counts, nalini.elkins
IETF95 remote attendance, Meetecho IETF support
- Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Stewart Bryant
  - Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Joseph Lorenzo Hall
    - Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Simon Pietro Romano
    - Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Meetecho IETF support
      - Re: [vmeet] IETF95 remote attendance, HANSEN, TONY L
      - Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Stewart Bryant
- Re: [vmeet] IETF95 remote attendance, Michael Richardson
  - Re: [vmeet] IETF95 remote attendance, Meetecho IETF support
- Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Mikael Abrahamsson
  - Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Mikael Abrahamsson
    - Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Meetecho IETF support
  - Re: IETF95 remote attendance, Meetecho IETF support
Remote Mentoring: Internet Draft Review Teams, nalini.elkins
Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Michael Richardson
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, chopps
  - Re: Time to kill layer 2, Ted Lemon
    - Re: Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      - Re: Time to kill layer 2, Christopher Morrow
        
        Re: Time to kill layer 2, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Time to kill layer 2, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      - Re: Time to kill layer 2, Charlie Perkins
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Dimitri Staessens
  - Re: Time to kill layer 2, Ted Lemon
    - Re: Time to kill layer 2, Carlos M. Martinez
      - RE: Time to kill layer 2, Chaitanya D
        
        Re: Time to kill layer 2, Dimitri Staessens
        
        Re: Time to kill layer 2, Dimitri Staessens
- Re: Time to kill layer 2, Time Warner Cable
  - Re: Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker
    - Re: Time to kill layer 2, Ted Lemon
      - Re: Time to kill layer 2, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Fw: new important message, bensons
Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Daniel Ajike Chidi
Transparency of IAOC, SM
- Re: Transparency of IAOC, SM
  - Re: Transparency of IAOC, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: Transparency of IAOC, Ted Lemon
    - Re: Transparency of IAOC, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
    - Re: Transparency of IAOC, Stephen Farrell
      - Re: Transparency of IAOC, Scott O. Bradner
        
        Re: Transparency of IAOC, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Transparency of IAOC, Randy Bush
    - Re: Transparency of IAOC, SM
  - Re: Transparency of IAOC, Ted Lemon
Hackathon results?, Paul Hoffman
Fwd: SecureSessionV1Server, Robert Withers
Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Yoav Nir
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Michael Richardson
  - Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
    - Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
      - Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, John C Klensin
        
        Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, John C Klensin
        
        Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt, Michael Richardson
Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Ted Lemon
  - Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy
    - Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Ted Lemon
      - Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Harald Alvestrand
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, HANSEN, TONY L
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, HANSEN, TONY L
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, HANSEN, TONY L
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Yoav Nir
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Lucy Lynch
        
        Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Michael Richardson
- Re: Qualifying for NomCom, Harald Alvestrand
Concerns about Singapore, Jari Arkko
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Adam Roach
- Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jeffrey Haas
  - Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dhruv Dhody
    - Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson
      - Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dhruv Dhody
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Mikael Abrahamsson
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ladislav Lhotka
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Christian Hopps
        
        China, Ole Jacobsen
        
        Re: China, Jeffrey Haas
        
        Re: China, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: China, Ole Jacobsen
        
        Re: China, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: China, Ole Jacobsen
        
        Re: China, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: China, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: China, Scott Bradner
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: China, Tim Chown
        
        Re: China, Ray Pelletier
        
        Re: China, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
        
        Re: China, Ray Pelletier
        
        Re: China, Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: China, Ole Jacobsen
        
        Re: China, Mary Barnes
        
        Re: China, HANSEN, TONY L
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, chopps
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, John Levine
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, John R Levine
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, Tony Finch
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places, tom p.
        
        UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places), Harald Alvestrand
        
        Re: UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places), Christopher Morrow
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places), Tim Chown
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch
        
        Message not available
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Robert Withers
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Michael StJohns
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, chopps
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Vinayak Hegde
        
        RE: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Hutton, Andrew
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Joel M. Halpern
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Richard Shockey
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir
        
        Virtual Meetings, John Leslie
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec
        
        1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), David Farmer
        
        Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Ted Lemon
        
        Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Mark Andrews
        
        Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Stephen Farrell
        
        Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Rich Kulawiec
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Rich Kulawiec
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Mary Barnes
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Christian Hopps
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Joel M. Halpern
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Joel M. Halpern
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Theodore V Faber
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Theodore V Faber
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Andy Bierman
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Alia Atlas
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Harald Alvestrand
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Yoav Nir
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Loa Andersson
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], chopps
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore], Loa Andersson
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, George Michaelson
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon
        
        Message not available
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Tim Chown
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Loa Andersson
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dhruv Dhody
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jeffrey Haas
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, HANSEN, TONY L
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Rich Kulawiec
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Theodore V Faber
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Tim Chown
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon
        
        Message not available
        Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Tim Chown
        
        Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Alia Atlas
        
        Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Tim Chown
        
        Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Theodore V Faber
        
        Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, lloyd.wood
        
        Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch
        
        Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, Mikael Abrahamsson
        
        Message not available
        Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore, Tim Chown
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, chopps
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Harald Alvestrand
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, John G. Scudder
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ladislav Lhotka
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Laurent Ciavaglia
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Bert Wijnen (IETF)
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Randy Bush
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Laurent Ciavaglia
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Leif Johansson
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Jared Mauch
        
        A distinction along Pete's dimensions (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore), John C Klensin
        
        Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Jari Arkko
        
        Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions, Ray Pelletier
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Mikael Abrahamsson
        
        SV: Concerns about Singapore, Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Patrik Fältström
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen
        
        Re: SV: Concerns about Singapore, Martin Rex
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Dirk-Willem van Gulik
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Toerless Eckert (eckert)
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Stefan Winter
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, David Conrad
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Yoav Nir
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, joel jaeggli
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Fred Baker (fred)
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Ole Jacobsen
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Patrik Fältström
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Warren Kumari
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, Andrew Allen
        
        Re: Concerns about Singapore, nalini.elkins

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IP Storage] [Linux SCTP] [IETF]

Powered by Linux