I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2016–6-30 IETF LC End Date: 2016–7-4 IESG Telechat date: 2016-7-7 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as standard track RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: 1. In section 2.1 “C (Co-routed path) bit: This informs the remote T-PE/S-PEs about the properties of the underlying LSPs. When set, the remote T-PE/S-PEs need to select co-routed LSP (as the forwarding tunnel) as the reverse PSN tunnel. If there is no such tunnel available, it may trigger the remote T-PE/S-PEs to establish a new LSP.” Why are you using non normative language here “need to” instead of MUST or SHOULD while for the S bit normative language is used? Nits/editorial comments:
|