Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> and you are kinda peotected by the community not being well-known,
>> i.e. different for each upstream. the attacker has to know the
>> community for each upstream and be able to not only inject the prefix
>> but also tag it with the correct community for each upstream.
> 
> Your argument comes down to "security through obscurity"

no.  non-transitiveness through local naming, the reason this has not
allowed serious damage in current practice.

randy




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]